Covil v. Robert & Co. Associates
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Presiding Judge.
“A motion for nonsuit merely takes the place of what is known to the common law practice as a demurrer to the evidence.” Clark v. Bandy, 196 Ga. 546, 559 (27 SE2d 17). “When a court passes upon a motion for a nonsuit it decides only one question—that is, do the allegation and the proof correspond?” Kelly v. Strouse, 116 Ga. 872, 883 (43 SE 280). In determining whether the trial court erred in granting a nonsuit, we must construe the evidence most strongly in favor of the plaintiffs. National Land &c. Co. v. Zugar, 171 Ga. 228 (2) (155 SE 7).
“ 'The law imposes upon…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Southern Railway Co. v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Shea v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Clark v. BandySupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Pilgrim v. LandhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- Ponce De Leon Condominiums v. DiGirolamoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine v. George A. Fuller Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Cincinnati Riverfront Coliseum, Inc. v. McNulty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
- Chastain v. Atlanta Gas Light Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.