Legal Opinion
Henderson v. Baird
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 5, 1959No. 37875PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Judge.
The status of the plaintiff, according to the allegation of the petition was that of a licensee on the defendants’ premises. “The duty generally owed a licensee by the owner or proprietor of premises is not to wilfully and wantonly injure him (Cobb v. First National Bank of Atlanta, 58 Ga. App. 160 (2), 198 S. E. 111), which includes the obligation not to lay for him or permit to exist pitfalls or mantraps in which it may be reasonably anticipated he will become ensnared (Bohn v. Beasley, 51 Ga. App. 341, 180 S. E. 656), that is concealed perils to which it may be reasonably…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Krueger v. MacDougaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Rollestone v. Cassirer & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Hudgins v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Palmer Brick Co. v. ChenallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Doyal v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Crosby v. Savannah Electric & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Patterson v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Handiboe v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Ford Motor Company v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Kahn v. GraperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.