Horluck Transportation Co. v. Eckright
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
— This is an action to enjoin a voluntary association from operating a sixteen-passenger-“Metro” bus without a certificate of “public convenience and necessity.”
*220The question presented is whether a voluntary association of individuals, owning a bus and operating under the conditions hereinafter indicated, is either a common carrier or an auto transportation company within the purview of RCW, chapter 81.68.
The association is, concededly, operating without a certificate from the state public service commission, “declaring that public convenience and necessity require such operation.” (See RCW…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Stephenson v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Cushing v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co. v. GrassmeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Straley v. Idaho Nuclear CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
- McDonald v. IrbyWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Horluck Transportation Co. v. EckrightWashington Supreme Court · 1960