Legal Opinion

Horluck Transportation Co. v. Eckright

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1960No. 35159PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

— This is an action to enjoin a voluntary association from operating a sixteen-passenger-“Metro” bus without a certificate of “public convenience and necessity.”

*220The question presented is whether a voluntary association of individuals, owning a bus and operating under the conditions hereinafter indicated, is either a common carrier or an auto transportation company within the purview of RCW, chapter 81.68.

The association is, concededly, operating without a certificate from the state public service commission, “declaring that public convenience and necessity require such operation.” (See RCW…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Stephenson v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Cushing v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co. v. GrassmeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Straley v. Idaho Nuclear CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  2. McDonald v. IrbyWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Horluck Transportation Co. v. EckrightWashington Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API