Legal Opinion

G. A. Nichols, Inc. v. Karnes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 24, 1940No. 29487PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

Plaintiff, Nichols, Inc., brought two actions against defendant, Karnes, to foreclose contracts for the sale of real estate for the unpaid balance due from defendant under the contracts. The cases were consolidated and tried together. From an adverse verdict and judgment, plaintiff appeals.

The contracts involved property in Nichols Hills and in Douglas Place addition to Oklahoma City. The defense in both cases was that the defendant was induced to enter into the contract to purchase the Douglas Place property by the false representation of plaintiff that such addition was modern, and that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nowka v. WestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Kelly v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Bowersock v. BarkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Martinson v. HamilSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. McAtee v. GarredSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bowman v. PresleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  2. Danner v. CarneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  3. White v. BergerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API