Legal Opinion

Byers v. Brisley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 26, 1921No. 9845PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error from District Court, Tillman County; Frank Mathews, Judge. Action by J. D. Byers against E. L. Bris-ley and W. E. Brisley for balance due on land note. Judgment for defendants, on counterclaim, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtNicholson, J.

In December, 1909, the defendant in error E. L. Brisley, while at Green River, Utah, inspected a tract of land consisting of 89.44 acres owned oy 8. D. Byers, the plaintiff in error; said land being shown to the defendant by the agent of said plaintiff, at which time said land was priced to said defendant at the sum of $15,776. A contract for the sale of said land was executed by the plaintiff at Green River, Utah, on January 5, 1910, and was by the defendant brought to his home at Frederick, Oklahoma, and there executed by him on February 5, 1910. In said contract it was provided that the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Howe v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Prescott v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Werline v. AldredSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Eagan Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  5. Brown v. Freeman & BynumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cummings v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Holcomb & Hoke Mfg. Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Thrams v. BlockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Viking Refrigerators, Inc. v. Mc-MeachinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. J. Crouch & Son v. HuberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API