Legal Opinion

People v. London

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 30, 2014No. E057249PublishedCited by 8 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION‡]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

A jury found defendant and appellant Christopher London guilty as charged of cultivating marijuana and possessing marijuana for sale. (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 11358 [cultivation], count 1, 11359 [possession for sale], count 2.) 2 Defendant was sentenced to three years’ probation, subject to terms and conditions including that he serve 60 days in jail.

At trial, defendant claimed he was lawfully growing 100 marijuana plants for a medical marijuana collective under the Compassionate Use Act of 1996 (the CUA) (§ 11362.5) and the Medical Marijuana Program Act (the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Montana v. EgelhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. People v. PoseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Noah KleinmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. People v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. United States v. KleinmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. Anthony PisarskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. People v. Derouen CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API