Legal Opinion

People v. Anderson

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 9, 2015No. F066737PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GOMES, J.

Defendant Jerry Trent Anderson was convicted of one count of cultivating marijuana. His contentions in this appeal are (1) the court failed to instruct the jury correctly on Anderson’s defense under the medical marijuana laws, and (2) evidence of the marijuana should have been excluded, and the information dismissed, because the police did not adhere to statutory evidence-preservation requirements when they destroyed all but some samples of the plants they seized from Anderson’s property.

We agree with the first argument and will reverse. The jury instructions failed to explain…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. BartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. People v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. People v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Verdugo v. Alliantgroup, L.P.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. United States v. Noah KleinmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. KleinmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. People v. Derouen CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. People v. Rose CA3California Court of Appeal · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API