Legal Opinion

Yrisarri v. Clifford

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1926No. 3005PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT

BICKLEY, J.

Suit by one assumed to be a gratuitous bailee of an automobile for damages to the said automobile alleged to have been' negligently caused by de<fendant in a collision. Plaintiff was “then and there controlling, driving, and operating” the bailed automobile. At the close of the case, the court on motion of the defendant, dismissed the complaint on the theory that the plaintiff could not maintain the suit regardless of who was to blame for the collision. If a gratuitous bailee may maintain an action for injuries by a stranger and wrongdoer to the article bailed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stotts v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Mizner v. FrazierMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Herries v. BellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  4. Little v. FossettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1852
  5. Gross v. Saratoga European Hotel & Restaurant Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Queenan v. MaysCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
  2. Petrus v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
  3. J. P. (Bum) Gibbins, Inc. v. Utah Home Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  4. Ebel v. CollinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  5. Carelli v. Toepfer, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API