Legal Opinion
B & B Bail Bonds Agency of Connecticut, Inc. v. Bailey
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 15, 2001No. SC 16188PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinimi
MCDONALD, C. J.
The sole issue in this writ of error is whether the trial court improperly denied the motions *210of the plaintiff in error, B & B Bail Bonds Agency of Connecticut, Inc. (B & B), for release from bond and for rebate from bond forfeiture. We answer that question in the negative.
The undisputed facts relevant to this claim are these: On December 12, 1996, Ralston Salmon, a Jamaican national, was arrested and charged with violations of General Statutes § 21a-279 (a), illegal possession of a narcotic substance, General Statutes § 21a-277 (a), illegal manufacture, distribution or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. SalmonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Herbert S. Newman & Partners, P.C. v. CFC Construction Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Blake v. BlakeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- County Fire Door Corp. v. C. F. Wooding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Banks v. ThomasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Schoonmaker v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Cadle Co. v. GinsbergConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Morrison v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Ryder v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- Oneto v. Town of HamdenDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.