Legal Opinion
Smith v. ABEL
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 23, 1957PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKestee, J.
This is an action for damages for breach of a contract for the sale of logs. Prom a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendants Amiel and Milford Abel, said defendants appeal.
The contract out of which the dispute arises was originally a three-party transaction, dated December 3, 1954, whereby (1) “Amiel Abel & Sons” agreed to furnish logs from certain property to a sawmill which they agreed might be erected and operated upon that property; (2) one Buck Sewell agreed to erect and operate the mill and to deliver the lumber to plaintiff, Lowell Smith, at the sawmill site;…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Parker v. Harris Pine Mills, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Henderson v. Union Pacific RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- O'HARRA v. PundtOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Smith v. PallayOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Salem Traction Co. v. AnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1902
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Davis v. Tyee Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Hall v. WorkOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Psg Co., a Corporation, and Philip S. Greenberg v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Douglas Construction Corp. v. Mazama Timber Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. ShawcrossNevada Supreme Court · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.