Legal Opinion

Smith v. Pallay

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1929PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

This is an action to recover damages for breach of contract. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendants have appealed.

In substance, the complaint alleges that on or about July 1, 1927, plaintiff entered into an oral contract with defendants whereby it was agreed that plaintiff, who was then practicing law in Portland, should give up his practice, provide himself with an automobile and go to reside with his family on one of defendants ’ ranches in Union County and act as manager for them of two ranches then owned by them, and also represent them as their attorney, in consideration of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. SomersOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Barter v. County of PimaArizona Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Sather v. GiaconiOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Pacific Livestock Co. v. MurrayOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  5. French v. CresswellOregon Supreme Court · 1886

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Booth-Kelly Lumber Co. v. Southern Pacific Co. Southern Pacific Co. v. Booth-Kelly Lumber CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  2. Parker v. Harris Pine Mills, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Hall v. CORNETTOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Enco, Inc. v. F. C. Russell Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Linkhart v. SavelyOregon Supreme Court · 1951

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API