Legal Opinion

Davis v. Tyee Industries, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1983No. CA A20704; SC 28894PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.

In Adams v. Crater Well Drilling, Inc., 276 Or 789, 556 P2d 679 (1976), we upheld an award of punitive damages recovered incident to an assumpsit claim for money had and received because the defendant’s conduct was “essentially tortious.” 276 Or at 794. The case at bar also involves a claim for money had and received and the question presented relates to the necessary pleading foundation to recover punitive damages incident to such a claim. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for general and punitive damages. The Court of Appeals affirmed, Davis v. Tyee Industries, Inc., 58 Or…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Fulton Insurance Co. v. White Motor Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Farris v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Western Feed Co. v. HeidloffOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Harper v. Interstate Brewery Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Lewis v. Worldwide Imports, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1964

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Nearing v. WeaverOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Bondi v. Citigroup, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
  3. Quigley v. Pet, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Lancaster v. Royal Insurance of AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Stringer v. Car Data Systems, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API