Legal Opinion

Lehto v. City of Oxnard

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 20, 1985No. Civ. B006073PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COMPTON, J.

Plaintiff Gary Lehto, severely injured in a collision between an automobile in which he was a passenger and the vehicle driven by one Raul Carbajal, instituted this action to recover damages from defendant City of Oxnard, et al. (City) for the alleged negligence of certain police officers in failing to prevent Carbajal from driving while under the influence of alcohol. The trial court granted the City’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and this appeal follows. We affirm.

A judgment on the pleadings is similar to a judgment following the sustaining of a demurrer and the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Davidson v. City of WestminsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Thompson v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Williams v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ezell v. CockrellTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Sumner Peck Ranch, Inc. v. Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1993
  3. Peter H. Doggett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Sullivan v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Lawman v. City & County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API