Legal Opinion
Sullivan v. City of Sacramento
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 4, 1987No. C000521PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PUGLIA, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from an order sustaining a demurrer to her second amended complaint for negligent infliction of emotional distress. Plaintiff contends that she has stated a cause of action against defendants and that the trial court erred in sustaining the demurrer. Alternatively plaintiff contends the trial court erred in denying leave to amend. We do not agree with either contention and shall affirm the judgment.
Facts
For purposes of this appeal, we take as true all well pleaded factual allegations of the complaint. (Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc. (1970) Cal.3d 493,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Molien v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Davidson v. City of WestminsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Muthukumarana v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Thompson Pacific Construction Inc. v. City of SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Peter H. Doggett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Berman v. BrombergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.