Legal Opinion

Peter H. Doggett v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 8, 1989No. 86-6109PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TANG, Circuit Judge:

Doggett appeals the district court’s dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of his Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) suit arising from an automobile accident caused by an intoxicated serviceman. The district court dismissed the action on the grounds that under California law the provider of alcoholic beverages is immune from tort liability and that no employee of the United States had the requisite “special relationship” with the intoxicated serviceman to create a duty to control his behavior. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

I. BACKGROUND

On October 6, 1983, Mark Patrick…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. John L. Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Sutton v. EarlesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. Scott A. Taber v. Robert S. Maine, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. Kevin HINES; Cathy Zampa, as Guardian Ad Litem for Stephanie Hines, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API