Legal Opinion

Ezell v. Cockrell

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1995PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether a police officer owes a duty of care to a third party injured by a drunk driver whom the police officer has failed to arrest.

Relying upon the public duty doctrine which shields public employees from such actions, the trial court dismissed the action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and the Court of Appeals — in a split decision — affirmed the dismissal. We granted the plaintiffs application for permission to appeal, and now affirm the Court of Appeals’ judgment, because we conclude that…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Cuffy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River Cty.Supreme Court of Florida · 1979
  5. Bradshaw v. DanielTennessee Supreme Court · 1993

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Houghton v. Aramark Educational Resources, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hawks v. City of WestmorelandTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Snyder v. Icard, Merrill, Cullis, Timm, Furen & Ginsburg, P.A.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Beaudrie v. HendersonMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API