Legal Opinion
Brown v. E.F. Hutton Group
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 8, 1990No. 89 Civ. 0611 (JMW)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WALKER, Circuit Judge: 1
Plaintiff investors charge defendants with fraudulent conduct in connection with the sale of interests in an oil and gas limited partnership. Defendants have moved to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 12(b)(6) and for failure to plead fraud with particularity pursuant to Rule 9(b), or in the alternative, for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b). For the reasons discussed below, defendants’ motions for summary judgment and for dismissal pursuant to Rule 9(b) are granted, the amended complaint…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Brown v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- CL-Alexanders Laing & Cruickshank v. GoldfeldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Sable v. Southmark/Envicon Capital Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Emergent Capital Investment Management, LLC v. Stonepath Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- In Re Donald J. Trump Casino Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.