Legal Opinion
Sable v. Southmark/Envicon Capital Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 26, 1993No. 90 Civ. 8047 (MBM)PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MUKASEY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Robert Sable, et al. sue defendants Southmark/Envicon Capital Corp., et al. under RICO and state law. Plaintiffs allege that defendants fraudulently induced them to invest in nine limited partnerships in the mid-1980s through misrepresentations and omissions in the private placement memoranda (the “PPMs”) for the partnerships.
In 1990 plaintiffs filed their first complaint in this case. In 1991 plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. On June 4, 1992 — after an April 7, 1992 conference at which I allowed plaintiffs to amend again but cautioned…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- In Re Keyspan Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- LaSalle National Bank v. Duff & Phelps Credit Rating Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. MoranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Old Republic Insurance v. Hansa World Cargo Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- In Re Pfizer Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.