Legal Opinion
Emergent Capital Investment Management, LLC v. Stonepath Group, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 2, 2001No. 00 CV 7723 (RWS)PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Stonepath Group, Inc. (“Sto-nepath”), previously known as Net Value Holdings, Inc. (“NETV”), Andrew Panzo (“Panzo”) and Lee Hansen (“Hansen”), have moved pursuant to Rule 56, Fed. R.Civ.P., for summary judgment to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff Emergent Capital Investment Management, LLC (“Emergent”) in action 00 Civ. 7723 (the “Initial Action”). The defendants have also moved under Rule 12(b)6 to dismiss the first amended complaint filed by Emergent in a related action, 01 Civ. 3936 (the “Second Action”) and Emergent has moved pursuant to Rule…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Emergent Capital Investment Management, LLC v. Stonepath Group, Inc., Previously Known as Net Value Holdings, Inc., Andrew Panzo and Lee HansenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- In Re Merrill Lynch & Co., Research Reports Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Century Pacific, Inc. v. Hilton Hotels Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- DeAngelis v. CorzineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Petedge, Inc. v. GargDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.