Legal Opinion

Toomey v. State Board of Land Commissioners

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1938No. 7,809PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

Plaintiff, a taxpayer, brought this proceeding originally in this court to enjoin the defendants from entering into an agreement designated as a “ Consolidated Lease and Operating Agreement,” which purports to pool state school lands with others in private ownership for unit operations for the production of natural gas and the apportionment of gas royalties on an acreage basis. By appropriate pleadings these facts are admitted or otherwise made to appear:

On March 27, 1930, defendants executed and delivered an oil and gas lease to P. E. Benedict covering 80 acres of state school land. On March…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Greene v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Patterson v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Rhoads Drilling Co. v. AllredTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  4. People v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Gas Products Co. v. RankinMontana Supreme Court · 1922

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Montanans for the Responsible Use of the School Trust v. State Ex Rel. Board of Land CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State Ex Rel. Thompson v. BabcockMontana Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Phillips Petroleum Company v. Heber A. Peterson and Astrid N. D. Peterson, Phillips Petroleum Company v. John H. Haslem and Rebecca H. HaslemCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  4. Friends of the Wild Swan v. Department of Natural Resources & ConservationMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Jeppeson v. State, Dept. of State LandsMontana Supreme Court · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API