Legal Opinion

Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 7, 1987No. Court 81-01-00030PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CARMAN, Judge:

This case is before the Court pursuant to a remand ordered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. See Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United States, 7 CIT 36, 587 F.Supp. 69 (1984), rev’d and remanded, 750 F.2d 62 (Fed.Cir. 1984). (Schott II). At issue is the proper tariff classification of seven types of glass which were described in invoices of entry papers for the merchandise as follows: KG 4, WG 345, UG 1, UG 5, UG 11, RG 9, and RG 830. All of the entered goods were classified, by the United States Customs Service (Customs), as “other…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. Stone & Downer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  5. Stewart-Warner Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. Starkey Laboratories, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
  3. Blakley Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
  4. Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  5. E.M. Chemicals v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API