Young Men's Shop v. Odend'Hal
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RUTLEDGE, Associate Justice.
Plaintiff, appellee here, brought his action for damages for personal injuries sustained by falling as he entered defendant’s business premises. The judgment was rendered upon the verdict of a jury. Defendant seeks reversal, claiming that there was no evidence of negligence; that the court erred in allowing the jury to determine whether plaintiff was an invitee or a licensee and that he was not guilty of contributory negligence; and that it erred also in refusing to give certain other instructions requested by defendant. We think there was no error in any of these…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Schmidt v. BauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Keeran v. Spurgeon Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Garrett v. W. S. Butterfield Theatres, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Herzog v. HemphillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Branan v. WimsattCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Arthur v. Standard Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Olivier v. SnowdenTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- Elton P. Lord and Geneva Lord v. Lencshire House, Ltd., Lencshire House, Ltd. v. Elton P. Lord and Geneva LordCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Hecht Co. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Willis v. StewartDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.