Legal Opinion

Willis v. Stewart

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 17, 1963No. 3200PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

Appellees, husband and wife, brought suit for personal injuries sustained by the wife, for attendant expenses, and for loss of consortium suffered by the husband. The jury returned a verdict in their favor. The trial judge, in a carefully considered opinion, denied appellants’ motions for a mew trial and fór judgment non obstante ■veredicto on the ground that the complaint stated a cause of action which, under all the testimony, was properly submitted to the jury. This appeal followed.

Appellees have lived in an apartment building owned by appellants for twenty-three…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mosheuvel v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Firfer Et Ux. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  3. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Childs Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Arthur v. Standard Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  5. Arial S. Dougherty v. Chas. H. Tompkins Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Morrison v. MacNamaraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Martin v. George Hyman Construction Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Jack Jeffries v. Potomac Development Corporation v. Erwin F. Simon & Associates and Thomas L. Watson, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  4. Linda M. Nelson, Parent of Nelson, Tracey R. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  5. Lynn v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API