Legal Opinion

Arthur v. Standard Engineering Co.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 25, 1951No. 10735PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judge.

The appellant, John H. Arthur, was an employee of the H. B. Foley Company which was the electrical subcontractor on a local building project. The appellee, Standard Engineering Company, was the steamfitting subcontractor.

The steamfitters constructed a rude scaffold for their own use in accomplishing their part of the work. Parallel with and about four feet from a large pipe already-installed, they placed a long plank, each end of which rested on a rigid support. Two shorter planks were put in a transverse po- - sition to span the four-foot space between the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Quigley v. . ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. McGlone v. William Angus, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Branan v. WimsattCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924
  5. Schwartzman v. LloydCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Ralph D. Smith and Thelma Smith v. Arbaugh's Restaurant, Inc., a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  3. Firfer Et Ux. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  4. Roberts v. RosenblattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  5. Jack Jeffries v. Potomac Development Corporation v. Erwin F. Simon & Associates and Thomas L. Watson, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API