Legal Opinion

Emigrant Mortg., Co., Inc. v. D'Agostino

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 18, 2006No. AC 25939PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCHALLER, J.

The defendant, Walter D’Agostino, appeals from the judgment of foreclosure by sale, rendered by the trial court, in favor of the plaintiff, Emigrant Mortgage Company, Inc. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) concluded that the plaintiff satisfied a condition precedent to commencing the foreclosure action and (2) admitted an exhibit into evidence that was neither a business record nor properly authenticated. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to the defendant’s appeal. On June 26, 2001,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. American Oil Co. v. ValentiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. New England Savings Bank v. Bedford Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Fidelity Bank v. KreniskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. State v. SwintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  5. Thompson v. OrcuttSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Duplissie v. DevinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  2. Jarvis v. LiederConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  3. Hirsch v. WoermerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  4. In re DemersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · 2014
  5. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. LorsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API