Legal Opinion

Neighbours v. Rittenhouse

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 22, 1929No. Docket No. 6413PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, J.

The appellant, as executor of the Estate of Jennie Rittenhouse Mallory, Deceased, in the course of administration of her estate, made payment to himself of the sums of $1,000 and $5,514.75, upon verified claims which had been presented to and approved by the court, which sums the executor claimed were due him for services as attorney at law rendered by him under a contract with the decedent, a copy of which contract was appended to and formed a part of the claims as presented to the court.

The 'record on appeal shows that prior to April, 1923, the decedent was the widow of one Frederick Eugene…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kisling v. ShawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Dimond v. SandersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. In Re Estate of BoyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Metropolis Tr. & Sav. Bank v. MonnierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. More v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Main v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Reynolds v. FraysherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Bradner. v. VasquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Munfrey v. ClearyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Estate of RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API