Nagel v. Dean
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Wright county, Giddings, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
DOUGLAS, Jr
Appeal from an order of the district court of Wright county denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. This action was brought for equitable relief, praying, among other things, that defendant be required to acknowledge and file in the office of the register of deeds of Wright county a plat purporting to subdivide a tract of land owned by her *26situated in the village of Buffalo, in said county. At the hearing it was mutually stipulated that H. T. Moland, county surveyor of Wright county, make a statement in the form of a plat, noting all measurements, courses, and distances…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hurley v. Mississippi & Rum River Boom Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- City of Corsicana v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
- State ex rel. City of St. Paul v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Borer v. LangeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Corning & Co. v. WoolnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tissino v. MavrakisWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
- Curtiss & Yale Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Poudler v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908