Legal Opinion

Borer v. Lange

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 20, 1890PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Le-■Sueur county, Edson, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtYand'erburgh, J.

In the southwest quarter of section 35, township 109, range 24, county of Le Sueur, is situated the village originally named “Logan,” now called “Elysian.” The section is fractional on account of the presence of lakes, and the tract which would otherwise constitute a regular quarter-section is an irregular subdivision. The land lying in the southeast corner, and extending for a considerable dis- ' tance west and north, is occupied by the waters of Lake Elysian, and on the north of the town lie Lake Dustin and Lake Francis. The town-*282site was laid out in 1856, and has since been inhabited as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Noonan v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  2. Hurley v. Mississippi & Rum River Boom Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  3. Turnbull v. SchroederSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  4. Tetherow v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  5. Williams v. LangevinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Doyle v. WohlrabeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Dittrich v. UblSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Bryant v. GustafsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Great Northern Railway Co. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  5. State ex rel. City of St. Paul v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API