Legal Opinion

Colborn v. Bailey

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 2, 1966No. 11455PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHER, Chief Justice.

This is an action brought by the appellee to enjoin appellant from parking her automobile on her driveway easement which crosses appellee’s premises. The court interpreted the words “for driveway purposes” in the easement across appellee’s premises, as meaning the “ * * * easement is to be used solely for ingress and egress * * * ” and, therefore, enjoined appellant from parking her car thereon.

The appeal is founded on one point of error and is:

The trial court erred in finding that an easement “for driveway purposes” does not include the right of appellant to park…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Penn Bowling Recreation Center, Inc. v. Hot Shoppes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  2. Keeler v. HakyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Baer v. Dallas Theater CenterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. Frumin v. MayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
  5. Picerne v. BotvinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1950

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Delgado v. WilsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  2. McNally v. Guevara, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  3. Christina Bogia v. Albert W. Kleiner, Jr.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2019
  4. Delgado v. WilsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. McNally v. Guevara, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API