Legal Opinion

Frumin v. May

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided January 14, 1952PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

Referring to the parties as they appeared below, the complainants, Abe Frumin and Jake Frumin, brothers and owners of the Dixie Machinery Company, Inc., filed this suit seeking a mandatory injunction to compel the defendant, William E. May, an adjacent landowner, to remove a wall and fence allegedly encroaching on their property, and also to compel the defendant to remove a fence and gate he had erected across an easement or right of way.

In their bill it is alleged in substance that since May 20, 1941, the complainants have owned the premises at 2313-15 Broad Street, in the City of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Adams Et Ux. v. Winnett Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
  2. Foshee v. BrigmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Erck v. ChurchTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Peoples v. HagamanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
  5. Long v. GarrisonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Marron v. ScarbroughCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1958
  2. Ogle v. TrotterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1973
  3. Colborn v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  4. Delgado v. WilsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. Christina Bogia v. Albert W. Kleiner, Jr.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API