Legal Opinion

Penn Bowling Recreation Center, Inc. v. Hot Shoppes, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 27, 1949No. 10020_1PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McALLISTER, Circuit Judge.

In 1938, the Norment Estate conveyed a portion of its real property to appellee, Hot Shoppes, Inc., and subjected a part thereof to a sixteen-foot right of way for ingress and egress. This resulted in an easement for the benefit of the balance of the unconveyed property, adjacent thereto, which was retained by the Estate, and which, by virtue of the easement, became the dominant tenement. A part of this dominant estate came into ownership of appellant, Penn Bowling Recreation Center, Inc., by mesne conveyances, in 1940, two years after the creation of the right of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Diocese of Trenton v. TomanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908
  2. McCullough v. Broad Exchange Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. Sachs v. ToquetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  4. Cleve v. NairinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  5. Shock v. Holt Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Lazy Dog Ranch v. Telluray Ranch Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  2. Brown v. VossWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Selvia v. ReitmeyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Byrd Companies, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Breliant v. Preferred Equities Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API