Legal Opinion

Golnik v. Amato

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided December 30, 2003No. 3:02-CV-777(EBB)PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS

BURNS, Senior District Judge.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

The Court sets forth only those facts deemed necessary to an understanding of the issues raised in, and decision rendered on, this Motion. The pertinent facts are culled from the Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint.

The Parties

Defendant Anthony Amato (“Amato”) was the Superintendent of Schools at all times pertinent herein. Defendant Attorney Frank Dumont (“Dumont”) was Assistant Director of Labor Relations at the pertinent times. Defendant Evelyn Irizar-ry was the Principal of Buckeley High School, where Plaintiff had…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Jackson Leeds v. Jonathan S. Meltz, Anthony Mansfield, Susan Ferraro, Merrick T. Rossein, Unknown John and Jane DoesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Derby Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
  2. Doe v. City of WaterburyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
  3. Silverman v. MirandaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  4. Collins v. Olin Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
  5. Tucker v. American International Group, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API