Legal Opinion
Doe v. City of Waterbury
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 28, 2006No. Civil Action 3:01cv2298 (SRU), 03cv571PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
STEFAN R. UNDERHILL, District Judge.
Between November 2000 and July 2001, Philip Giordano, then-mayor of the City of Waterbury (‘Waterbury”), sexually abused the two minor plaintiffs, Jane Doe, Jr. (“Doe”) and Susan Roe, Jr. (“Roe”), on numerous occasions at the mayor’s office, home, and in his city-issued police cruiser.
In September 2001, a federal grand jury returned an 18-count superceding indictment. Specifically, the indictment charged Giordano with: (1) depriving two minor children of their due process liberty right to be free from sexual abuse, in…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Roe v. City of WaterburyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Frisenda v. INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF MALVERNEDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Mangino v. Incorporated Village of PatchogueDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Samirah v. SabhnaniDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Meyers v. KishimotoDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.