Legal Opinion

Nybladh v. Peoples State Bank of Warren

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 6, 1956No. 36,688PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Murphy, Justice.

This is an action for a declaratory judgment to determine plaintiff’s liability as maker of a note. A “cross-claim” by defendant, 1 as payee, for the full amount thereof plus interest and collection expenses resulted in a directed verdict for defendant. From the order denying his motion “for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or in the alternative, for amended Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order for Judgment, or for a new trial,” 2 plaintiff appeals.

Although this action concerns plaintiff’s liability on a $2,089.29 note made by him payable to defendant bank, it…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. McGovern v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Shaughnessy v. EidsmoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. Hammel v. FeighSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. Cyrus v. CyrusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  5. Exsted v. ExstedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cederstrand v. Lutheran BrotherhoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Richard W. Anderson v. Property Developers, Inc., and Ferris E. Traylor, Richard W. Anderson v. Two Rivers, Incorporated, and Ferris E. TraylorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  4. Butler v. McGeeWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Kramer v. BrunsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API