McGovern v. . City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtCardozo, J.
The plaintiffs made a contract with the defendant, the city of New York, in August, 1916, for the construction of that part of the subway known as route number 61 in consideration of the payment of $4,194,797. They assert the existence of a later contract by which the defendant, acting through the public service commission and the board of estimate and apportionment, undertook to pay to them the extra cost incurred through the advance in the price of labor and material as a consequence of the war. The validity of that contract is the chief question to be determined. The circumstances leading…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Child Labor Tax CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Prigg v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Fire Ins. Assn., Ltd. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Wisconsin & Michigan Railway Co. v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Allegheny College v. National Chautauqua County Bank of JamestownNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Wilentz v. HendricksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
- Wilentz v. HendricksonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Blakeslee v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- State Ex Rel. Lane v. DashiellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.