Legal Opinion

Exsted v. Exsted

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 29, 1938No. 31,498PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gallagher, Chief Justice.

Action to determine adverse claims to realty. Suit is brought by the divorced wife of Harry H. Exsted, deceased, as administra-trix of his estate and as guardian of his sole heir.

The decedent purchased the farm over which this contest is waged from his mother in 1923, giving back a mortgage for $6,913. On September 1, 1930, he and his wife conveyed this and another farm, together with some urban property, to defendant Frank Exsted. In 1932 Harry paid to his mother’s administrator the balance of the mortgage debt remaining unpaid. From 1930 to 1935 Harry let the farm…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hotaling v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Burmeister v. GustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  3. Bowers v. SchulerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Geraghty v. KilroySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  5. Begovich v. KruljacWyoming Supreme Court · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of ConnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  2. Ehmke v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  3. Keough v. St. Paul Milk Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. Roberts v. FriedellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. Suske v. StrakaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API