Legal Opinion
Twin Laboratories, Inc. v. Weider Health & Fitness, a Corporation, I, Brute Enterprises, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 9, 1990No. 978, Docket 89-7972PublishedCited by 240 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TIMBERS, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Twin Laboratories, Inc. (“Twinlab”) appeals from a summary judgment entered August 30, 1989 in the Southern District of New York, Michael B. Mu-kasey, District Judge, in favor of appellees Weider Health & Fitness (“Weider") and L, Brute Enterprises, Inc. (“Brute”).
The final judgment entered August 30, 1989 was based on two prior orders. The first, dated July 21, 1989, granted appel-lees' motion for summary judgment on all of Twinlab’s antitrust claims. The second, dated August 25,1989, 720 F.Supp. 31 (S.D. N.Y.1989), denied Twinlab’s motion for reconsideration…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by240 opinions
- International Audiotext Network, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Delaware & Hudson Railway Company v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Morris v. Northrop Grumman Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Hall v. City of White PlainsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. United Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
235 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.