Legal Opinion
Allen v. McBride
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 2004No. 2004-0242 and 2004-0407PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.
{¶ 1} This appeal requires us to consider a single narrow issue — whether R.C. 2305.19, Ohio’s saving statute, applies to will-contest actions. For the reasons that follow, we answer this question in the affirmative and affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
{¶ 2} The relevant facts concerning the certified question before us are undisputed. We focus only on the details necessary to place that issue in context.
{¶ 3} On March 22, 2002, plaintiff-appellee, Patsy J. Allen, filed a will-contest action in the Probate Division of the Franklin County Common Pleas Court *22concerning the validity…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lewis v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Reese v. Ohio State University HospitalsOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Osborne v. AK Steel/Armco Steel Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- Osborne v. AK Steel/Armco Steel Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- Barnes v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by9 opinions
- Vitantonio, Inc. v. BaxterOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- United Telephone Credit Union v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Eppley v. Tri-Valley Local School Dist., Ct2007-0022 (1-3-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Henton v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Vitantonio, Inc. v. Baxter, Unpublished Decision (3-31-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.