Legal Opinion
Osborne v. AK Steel/Armco Steel Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided October 2, 2002No. 2001-0916PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 96 Ohio St.3d 368.] OSBORNE ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. AK STEEL/ARMCO STEEL COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as Osborne v. AK Steel/Armco Steel Co.,
2002-Ohio-4846.] Civil Rights Commission—R.C. 2305.19, the saving statute, applies to claims filed pursuant to R.C. Chapter 4112. (No. 2001-0916—Submitted March 26, 2002—Decided October 2, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-000320. __________________ SYLLABUS OF THE COURT R.C. 2305.19, the saving statute, applies to claims filed pursuant to R.C. Chapter 4112.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cosgrove v. Williamsburg of Cincinnati Management Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- Elek v. Huntington National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Lewis v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Reese v. Ohio State University HospitalsOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Cosgrove v. Williamsburg of Cincinnati Mgt. Co., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- You v. Northeast Ohio Med. Univ.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Allen v. McBrideOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- United Telephone Credit Union v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Eppley v. Tri-Valley Local School Dist., Ct2007-0022 (1-3-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Portee v. Cleveland Clinic Found. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.