Legal Opinion

Osborne v. AK Steel/Armco Steel Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 2002No. 2001-0916PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

{¶ 1} On November 30, 1995, plaintiffs-appellants, Suzanne M. Osborne, Norman P. Griffin, and Thomas Downs (collectively “Osborne”), were discharged from their employment with defendant-appellee, AK Steel/Armco Steel Company (“AK Steel”). Osborne filed suit in federal district court on May 28, 1996, alleging pension discrimination in violation of federal law and age discrimination in violation of state law. On December 2, 1998, the federal court granted AK Steel’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed Osborne’s pension discrimination claim with prejudice. In the same order, the federal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cosgrove v. Williamsburg of Cincinnati Management Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Elek v. Huntington National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Lewis v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Reese v. Ohio State University HospitalsOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Crandall v. IrwinOhio Supreme Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Osborne v. AK Steel/Armco Steel Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Allen v. McBrideOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. United Telephone Credit Union v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Eppley v. Tri-Valley Local School Dist., Ct2007-0022 (1-3-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Portee v. Cleveland Clinic Found. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API