Legal Opinion

United Telephone Credit Union v. Roberts

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 2007No. 2006-1174PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moyer, C J.

{¶ 1} In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether in challenging an order appointing a conservator pursuant to R.C. 1733.361(A)(2), a credit union must act through its board of directors or whether an individual member, director, or former director may bring the action. Additionally, we are asked to determine whether the saving statute R.C. 2305.19 applies to actions filed under R.C. 1733.361(A)(2).

A

{¶ 2} Appellant, United Telephone Credit Union, is an Ohio-chartered financial institution. The credit union is regulated by the Ohio Department of Commerce, Division of Financial…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Lewis v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State Ex Rel. Asti v. Ohio Department of Youth ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rosen v. CelebrezzeOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Ferguson v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Coburn v. Auto-Owners InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. State ex rel. Cordray v. Court of ClaimsOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. American Mutual Share Ins. v. Cumis Ins. Soc., 08ap-576 (1-29-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API