Vitantonio, Inc. v. Baxter
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCupp, J.
{¶ 1} In this appeal we are asked to determine whether the saving statute R.C. 2305.19 applies to actions filed against a decedent’s estate under R.C. 2117.12. We hold that it does.
*196Facts and Procedural History
{¶ 2} Because this cause was dismissed by the trial court pursuant to Civ.R. 12(B)(6), we accept the material allegations of the complaint as true. The complaint alleges as follows: Decedent, William Vitantonio, was a minority shareholder in Vitantonio, Inc., and a majority shareholder in Wickliffe Floral, Inc. Appellees are the two corporations just named and shareholders Louis…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Frysinger v. LeechOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Allen v. McBrideOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Barnes v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dombroski v. WellPoint, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
- Wilson v. Lawrence (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- LaNeve v. Atlas Recycling, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
- Thorton v. Montville Plastics & Rubber, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
- Starner v. OndaOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.