Legal Opinion

Gulotta v. Triano

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 21, 1980No. 2 CA-CIV 3400PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICHMOND, Judge.

The question on this appeal is whether one who has landlocked his property by voluntary alienation of a means of ingress and egress may thereafter acquire a private way of necessity over other land by condemnation under A.R.S. § 12-1202.

Plaintiffs owned and operated a delicatessen fronting on Tanque Verde Road in Tucson. The business was located on a parcel of land extending south and to the west behind a liquor store next door to the delicatessen. On September 27, 1976, they entered into a written agreement to sell the delicatessen and so much of the land as lay north…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Solana Land Co. v. MurpheyArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State ex rel. Carlson v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Lankin v. TerwilligerOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  4. French v. BrinkmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Cienega Cattle Co. v. AtkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Clouse Ex Rel. Clouse v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Coquina Oil Corp. v. Harry Kourlis RanchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  3. Cordwell v. SmithIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Bickel v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  5. Dabrowski v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API