Legal Opinion

Bickel v. Hansen

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 19, 1991No. 2 CA-CV 91-0015PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Presiding Judge. n

This is an appeal from a judgment granting the condemning of a private way of necessity. The determinative issue is whether the trial court erred in finding that the appellees (Bickel) did not already have reasonable access to their property by means of an implied way of necessity. We find that it did and reverse.

FACTS

Bickel owns 20 acres of land in Navajo County, Arizona. It was originally part of a larger tract of land known as Jaques Ranch. The original U.S. patent to the property of which the Bickel land is a small part, was issued in 1890 to William…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Palmer v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Barrick v. GilletteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  3. Finn v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Solana Land Co. v. MurpheyArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Calhoun v. OzburnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Carroll v. MeredithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
  2. Clouse Ex Rel. Clouse v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Tobias v. DaileyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. Dabrowski v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  5. College Book Centers, Inc. v. Carefree Foothills Homeowners' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API