Legal Opinion

Voellmeck v. Harding

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1931No. 23418. Department OnePublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeeler, J.

This is an action based upon fraud and deceit, brought by the plaintiff to recover the sum of $43,647.50 from the defendants Harding and wife, growing out of the sale and purchase of 2,500 shares of the capital stock of the Inland Sales Company, a domestic corporation. The cause was tried to the court and a jury, resulting in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the full amount sued for. The defendants’ motions for judgment non obstante veredicto, or, in the alternative, for a new trial, were overruled, and a formal judgment was entered against the defendants, from which they have appealed.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strong v. RepideSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Lawson v. VernonWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. McDonough v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  4. Zimmerman v. BitnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
  5. McCabe v. KelleherOregon Supreme Court · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hilton v. MumawCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. American Trust Co. v. California Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Salter v. HeiserWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Scott-Douglas Corp. v. Greyhound Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1973
  5. Shermer v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API