Legal Opinion
Scott-Douglas Corp. v. Greyhound Corp.
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided February 23, 1973PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Judge.
Defendants, Greyhound Corporation (“Greyhound”) and Horne’s Enterprises, Inc. (“Horne’s”), have moved for summary judgment and dismissal as to Greyhound in this action brought by Scott-Douglas Corporation, Max Seigel, Robert K. Seigel and Bernard Feinberg for breach of a franchise contract and fraud in the inducement of the contract.
Scott-Douglas Corporation was organized under the laws of this State for the purpose of owning and operating a Horne’s motor lodge near Newark, Delaware. The individual plaintiffs, Max and Robert Seigel and Bernard Feinberg were promoters of…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Cederstrand v. Lutheran BrotherhoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Candler v. HeighoMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Brady v. Central Excavators, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Martin v. D. B. Martin Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1913
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Fletcher v. Atex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Dewitt Truck Brokers, Inc. v. W. Ray Flemming Fruit Company and W. Ray FlemmingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Japan Petroleum Co.(Nigeria) Ltd. v. Ashland OilDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1978
- Hatley v. StaffordOregon Supreme Court · 1978
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.