Legal Opinion

Brogden v. Slater

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 28, 1930No. 2364PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LENROOT, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office in an interference proceeding. The invention involved is a process of preparing fresh fruit for market, comprising subjecting the fruit to the action of a solution of sodium hypochlorite to prevent decay.

There are six counts comprising the issue, which read as follows:

“1. A process which comprises the step of bringing the entire exterior surface of fruit into a contact with a non-poisonous disinfectant solution containing a hypochlorite of an alkali-forming metal.
“2. The process which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beidler v. CapsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  2. Gowen v. HendryCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  3. Lynch v. HeadleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  4. Seymour v. MolyneuxCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Deibel v. Heise & SchumacherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  2. Field v. StowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  3. Neumair v. MalocsayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API