Seymour v. Molyneux
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Appeal from the Patent Office. Interference proceedings in the Patent Office between George E. Molyneux and Dudley S. Seymour. From a decision for the senior party, Seymour appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
ROBB, Associate Justice.
Appeal from a decision of the Patent Office in an interference proceeding awarding priority to the senior party; the contention of the junior party being that his adversary has no right to malee the claim.
As originally declared the interference contained a single count, which had been formulated by the Primary Examiner and suggested to the parties. The declaration of the interference having given each party access to the other’s application, Molyneux presented an- amendment containing six claims, which, as he represented to the Patent Office, embodied “the substance of…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Brogden v. SlaterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- McIntyre v. DodgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928
- Jorgensen v. KingslandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1949
- Seymour v. MolyneuxCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1920
- Benedek v. CoeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.