Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Beidler v. Caps

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 19, 1929No. 2156PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LENROOT, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents in an interference proceeding, affirming the unanimous decisions of the lower tribunals of the Patent Office awarding priority of invention to the senior parties, Caps and Leininger, appellees herein.

The invention in controversy relates to photographing apparatus, and more specifically to a film holding means which is capable of holding the film in the focal plane of said apparatus, and in so mounting the means as to permit its movement while in the camera to present the two sides of the film (sensitized…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Courson v. O'ConnorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915
  2. Greenawalt v. DwightCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1919
  3. Leonard v. EverettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Monsanto Company v. KampDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
  4. Goodwin v. Borg-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
  5. Uihlein v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API