Legal Opinion
Gowen v. Hendry
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided January 27, 1930No. Patent Appeal 2216PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HATFIELD, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal in an.interf erence proceeding from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents. The Examiner of Interferences, the Examiners in Chief, and the Commissioner of Patents have concurred in holding that appellant was not entitled to an award of priority of invention.
The invention in issue relates to certain improvements in vacuum tubes or audions. The counts involved read as follows:
“1. A vacuum tube comprising a plurality of electrodes one of which is a plate electrode, insulating material supported by said plate eleetrode above one edge thereof, and a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re DunbarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922
- Davis-Bournonville Co. v. Alexander Milburn Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Erben v. YardleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1920
- Earles v. GomberDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1921
- Cowles v. RodyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Frederick F. Glass v. William C. De RooCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Fernand Georges Bac v. Alfred L. Loomis, Andrew Alford v. Alfred L. Loomis, (Two Cases)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Fageol v. MidboeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
- Hendrickson & Nelson v. Ronning & RonningCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
- Phelan v. GreenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.